EL7.AI
Strategy BuilderCOT DataAdvanced NewsResearchNewEarnings CalendarEconomic Calendar
We use cookiesPrivacy Policy
EL7.AIEL7.AI

AI Financial Intelligence
Professional analysis of central bank decisions

© 2026 EL7.AI. All rights reserved.

Markets

  • News
  • Forex
  • Stocks
  • Crypto
  • Gold
  • Commodities
  • Indices
  • ETFs

Analysis

  • Fed
  • ECB
  • BLS
  • COT
  • Economic Calendar

Learn

  • Service Guide
  • Oil

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Data Methodology
  • AI Disclosure
  • Pricing
  • Enterprise
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Security
  • WhatsApp
Status data is currently unavailable

The information provided on EL7.AI is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

Home
Stocks
Energy Fuels Inc.
UUUU

UUUU Energy Fuels Inc.

Energy Fuels Inc. · AMEX
Market Closed
12.95
▼ ⁦-4.99%⁩ (-0.68)
Market Cap$3.2B
Beta1.54
52w Low52w High
10.8027.90
Last Week
⁦-9.38%⁩
Last Month
⁦-8.42%⁩
Last 3 Months
⁦-28.06%⁩
Last Year
⁦+14.00%⁩
EL7 Factor Analysis
How we score this
Overall9
Poor — bottom quartile of the marketSucker StockF 2/9Better than 9% of Market stocks, per EL7's model
FactorScoreDistributionValueAvgRank
▸
Valuation
8
—17.8xBottom tier
▸
Growth
94
62.5%▲7.1%Top tier
▸
Quality
30
-9.1%▼4.5%Bottom tier
▸
Safety
43
—2.6xAround median
▸
Capital Return
11
—2.12%Bottom tier
▸
Momentum
26
11.6%▲2.9%Bottom tier
▸
Sentiment
89
2▼3Top tier
Compare in the screener
Premium content

Get Your Premium Account Now

  • Stock Deep Analysis
  • The Advanced News Platform
Recommended
Annual plan
$17/mo
Monthly plan
$29/mo

Analyst Consensus

This section combines price targets, revision history, analyst coverage changes, and an AI summary of what changed on the Street.

Price Target· 1 analysts setting price target
$21.06
⁦+62.6%⁩
Current Price $12.95·Median $19.50
Low
$16.00
High
$29.25
Current price
$12.95
Average target
$21.06
Average rating
★ 4.13
Buy
Analyst coverage
8
Buy conviction
100%
High
Rating activity · 30d
1↑ · 0↓
Target dispersion
102%
Wide
Analyst ratings over time8 analysts rating
1
7
Strong BuyBuyHoldSellStrong Sell
Rating trend — last 12 months4.00 → 4.13
Recent analyst moves
  • = Reiterate2026-09-01
    H.C. Wainwright
    Buy
  • ⬆ Upgrade2026-08-14
    UBS
    Neutral
  • = Reiterate2026-08-14
    BMO Capital
    Outperform
Premium content
Key Financials

Ten ratios that matter, each compared against its sector median and average — so you can see whether a number is rich or cheap relative to peers in the same sector.

StockSector medianSector averagetypical sector range
MetricValuePosition within sectorVerdict
  • P/E (TTM)
    —
    —
  • Forward P/E
    227.99x
    3.36x26.89x
    Very expensive
  • EV / EBITDA
    —
    —
  • FCF Yield
    -2.1%
    -21.0%15.7%
    Above average
  • Revenue Growth YoY
    62.5%
    -19.7%63.1%
    Strong
  • EPS Growth YoY
    34.7%
    -141.8%256.7%
    Near median
  • Gross Margin
    40.9%
    7.8%72.1%
    Above average
  • ROIC
    -9.1%
    -12.7%20.6%
    Below average
  • Net Debt / EBITDA
    —
    —
  • Dividend Yield
    —
    —
  • Payout Ratio
    —
    —
  • Altman Z-Score
    —
    —
Financial Analysis
|

Stock Analysis

AI-generated
Based on 2026-05-07 data

Company Overview

Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) operates through an interconnected chain encompassing uranium production, rare earth element processing, and the development of heavy mineral sands projects. White Mesa Mill in Utah is the hub of this system; it is the only facility in the United States capable of commercially processing monazite, and the company uses its expertise in handling radioactive ores to extract uranium and produce rare earth element oxides. The Varamata projects in Madagascar, Bahia in Brazil, and Donald in Australia are intended to supply monazite, while the acquisition of Australian Strategic Materials, completed on August 28, 2026, added metals and alloys production capabilities and an operating facility in Korea to the mine-to-alloy chain.

In Q1 of fiscal year 2026, the company generated revenue of $35.8 million and gross profit of $14.4 million, equivalent to a gross margin of approximately 40.2%, but recorded a net loss of $10.8 million and a loss per share of $0.04. The loss improved compared with a net loss of $20.8 million in Q4 of fiscal year 2025, while the quarter's revenue alone exceeded half of fiscal year 2025 revenue of $65.9 million. On a trailing-twelve-month basis in fiscal year 2026, revenue reached $84.9 million and gross profit was $29.3 million, compared with a net loss of $70.2 million.

Uranium led operating performance in Q1 of fiscal year 2026; the company mined 425 thousand pounds, White Mesa Mill processed approximately 800 thousand pounds, and the period ended with inventory of about 2.25 million pounds. The company sold 100 thousand pounds on the spot market at an average of $95.88 per pound and 110 thousand pounds through long-term utility contracts at just under $64 per pound, while management stated that total sales reached 510 thousand pounds during the quarter. In parallel, the company produced terbium on a pilot basis at a rate of approximately one kilogram per week and continued the Phase 1B and Phase 1C expansions with the aim of adding heavy elements and processing uranium and rare earth elements simultaneously.

What's Driving the Stock

Earnings callEDGAR filings30-day newsInsider activity

Automated analysis for informational purposes only — not investment advice.

The uranium business showed clear momentum in Q1 of fiscal year 2026, with 425 thousand pounds mined, approximately 800 thousand pounds processed, and processed production exceeding one million pounds during April 2026; management maintained annual processing guidance at 1.5–2.5 million pounds.
  • The cost basis of uranium inventory is declining as low-cost Pinyon Plain production is added; all-in mining, transportation, and processing costs were $23–30 per pound, and inventory cost fell to $36 per pound by the end of Q1 of fiscal year 2026, with management expecting cost of goods sold to approach $30 per pound during fiscal year 2026.
  • Energy Fuels completed the acquisition of Australian Strategic Materials on August 28, 2026, adding metals and alloys production, an operating facility in Korea, and the Dubbo project to its platform; this addresses the metal conversion link that management described as a bottleneck in the rare earth element supply chain outside China.
  • The company's terbium oxide passed all qualification tests conducted by one of Japan's largest permanent magnet manufacturers, according to the August 19, 2026 announcement, supporting a transition from pilot production of approximately one kilogram per week toward a broader commercial pathway. Management says potential customer demand is strong for terbium and dysprosium because alternatives that eliminate heavy rare earth elements have not been proven at scale.
  • Project studies provide investors with substantial quantitative indicators, although they are forward-looking: the Varamata study showed a net present value of $1.8 billion and expected annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization exceeding $500 million, while the White Mesa Phase 2 study estimated capital expenditure of approximately $410 million, net present value of approximately $1.9 billion, and standalone annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization of approximately $311 million.
  • Buying & Selling Case

    ▲ Buying Case5 pts

    • +White Mesa Mill has a distinctive operating position as the only U.S. facility capable of commercially processing monazite, and Phase 1C aims to remove the current constraint that prevents uranium and rare earth elements from being processed at the same time.
    • +Liquidity supports the company's ability to fund its plan; it ended Q1 of fiscal year 2026 with working capital of $957 million and total assets of $1.4 billion, and working capital included $621 million in net proceeds from the convertible note issuance completed in Q4 of fiscal year 2025.
    • +The net loss improved to $10.8 million in Q1 of fiscal year 2026 from $20.8 million in Q4 of fiscal year 2025, alongside higher uranium sales and lower inventory costs. The company also recorded operating cash flow of $8 million during the quarter.
    • +The mine-to-alloy chain enhances opportunities to capture greater margins through the monazite projects, White Mesa Mill, and the alloy facility in Korea, while uranium inventory of approximately 2.25 million pounds provides flexibility between long-term contracts and spot sales.
    • +Insider activity provided a limited supportive signal, as net purchases during the three months ended with the latest transaction on July 8, 2026 totaled approximately $1 million, with two purchases and no sales recorded.

    ▼ Selling Case7 pts

    • −The company remains unprofitable despite the quarterly improvement; the net loss was $10.8 million in Q1 of fiscal year 2026, and the trailing-twelve-month loss reached $70.2 million, following an annual loss of $85.6 million in fiscal year 2025. The earnings turnaround therefore depends on continued uranium sales, cost improvements, and the execution of projects that have not yet reached full operation.
    • −The rare earth element strategy requires substantial spending and execution; White Mesa Phase 2 is estimated to cost approximately $410 million and remains in the permitting stage, while management targets late 2027 for Phase 1B and Phase 1C operations. Any cost increase or delay in construction or permitting could defer the cash flows assumed in the feasibility studies.
    • −The Varamata project experienced a delay in its investment agreement following the change of government in Madagascar, and its progress remains tied to completing a multifaceted government agreement. Meanwhile, the final investment decision for Donald was delayed due to the complexity of coordinating financing, two separate offtake agreements, and approval from joint venture partner Astron.
    • −Uranium production remains exposed to fluctuations in grades, prices, and demand; Pinyon Plain mined ore with an average grade of 1.12% from a lower-grade zone, while management said on May 7, 2026 that it had not yet seen a significant increase in utility purchasing schedules. Older, lower-priced contracts will also remain in place during subsequent years, and 110 thousand pounds were sold in Q1 of fiscal year 2026 at just under $64 per pound compared with $95.88 per pound for spot sales.
    • −White Mesa Mill is operating faster than the current mines can supply ore, so the company planned a maintenance shutdown at the end of Q2 and the beginning of Q3 of fiscal year 2026. Until Phase 1C is completed, the facility cannot process uranium and rare earth elements simultaneously, imposing an operating trade-off dependent on market conditions.

    Valuation

    The analyst consensus is "Buy," with an average price target of $21 and a wide range between $16 and $29; the average is below the top of the 52-week range of $27.90, while the highest target is slightly above that peak. No positive price-to-earnings multiple is available because the trailing-twelve-month net loss in fiscal year 2026 was $70.2 million, so the valuation is largely based on executing the White Mesa expansions and rare earth element projects and shifting the uranium business toward profitability, with the wide target range remaining evidence of high uncertainty.

    BuyAnalyst target: $21(+62.2%)

    Figures in the text are as of 2026-08-31; the live price is shown at the top of the page.

    FAQ

    How does Energy Fuels generate its revenue?

    The company combines spot uranium sales with long-term contracts and is building an integrated rare earth element and heavy mineral sands chain. In Q1 of fiscal year 2026, it sold 100 thousand pounds of uranium on the spot market at an average of $95.88 per pound and 110 thousand pounds under long-term contracts at just under $64 per pound. Total revenue for the period was $35.8 million and gross profit was $14.4 million, while the Varamata, Donald, and Bahia projects are intended to supply monazite to the White Mesa facility.

    Why is White Mesa Mill important to the UUUU stock thesis?

    White Mesa Mill is the company's uranium and rare earth element processing hub and is the only facility in the United States capable of commercially processing monazite. The facility processed approximately 800 thousand pounds of uranium in Q1 of fiscal year 2026 and exceeded one million pounds during April 2026. Phase 1B aims to produce commercial quantities of terbium and dysprosium, while Phase 1C is expected to allow uranium and rare earth element materials to be processed simultaneously when operations are targeted for late 2027.

    What did the acquisition of Australian Strategic Materials add to Energy Fuels?

    Energy Fuels completed the acquisition of Australian Strategic Materials on August 28, 2026 after announcing it on January 20, 2026. The transaction added a commercial metals and alloys production facility in Korea and the polymetallic Dubbo project, expanding the chain from raw materials and oxides to metals and alloys. The company plans to review the engineering of Dubbo, which was based on producing rare earth element hydroxide and sending it to White Mesa for processing, without providing final financial figures for the transaction's impact within the available data.

    Is the uranium business approaching profitability?

    Management said on May 7, 2026 that the uranium segment had begun showing promising results and a trend toward profitability. All-in mining, transportation, and processing costs were $23–30 per pound, and inventory cost fell to $36 per pound by the end of Q1 of fiscal year 2026, with cost of goods sold expected to approach $30 per pound during fiscal year 2026. However, the company as a whole remained at a net loss of $10.8 million for the quarter and $70.2 million over the trailing twelve months.

    What are the company's main rare earth element catalysts?

    The company produced its first terbium on a pilot scale at a rate of approximately one kilogram per week during Q1 of fiscal year 2026. On August 19, 2026, it announced that the terbium oxide had passed all qualification tests conducted by one of Japan's largest permanent magnet manufacturers. Phase 1B supports expansion toward commercial quantities of terbium and dysprosium, while Phase 2 targets capacity exceeding six thousand metric tons of NdPr annually after permitting and commissioning are completed.

    What are the most important execution risks facing the growth projects?

    White Mesa Phase 2 requires estimated capital expenditure of approximately $410 million and remains in the permitting process, while the company targets late 2027 for Phase 1B and Phase 1C operations. The investment agreement for the Varamata project was delayed following the change of government in Madagascar, despite the company's continued discussions with officials. The final investment decision for Donald was also delayed pending coordination of financing, two product offtake agreements, and approval from partner Astron, so the forward-looking values in the feasibility studies remain contingent on execution.

  • −Rare earth elements face the risk of alternative innovation, as magnet manufacturers are working to design products that reduce reliance on terbium and dysprosium. Management explained on May 7, 2026 that these alternatives had not yet been proven at scale, but their future success could weaken demand for the heavy products on which Phase 1B is focused.
  • −There is no positive price-to-earnings multiple to rely on because of the losses, while the 52-week range is wide, from $10.65 to $27.90. The average analyst target of $21 is also below the top of the range, highlighting the valuation's sensitivity to the execution of rare earth element projects and the achievement of profitability rather than reliance on current earnings.