| Factor | Score | Distribution | Value | Avg | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Valuation | 34 | — | 17.8x | Bottom tier | |
Growth | 91 | 408.3% | 7.1% | Top tier | |
Quality | 23 | -2.4% | 4.5% | Bottom tier | |
Safety | 49 | 10.3x | 2.6x | Around median | |
Capital Return | 6 | 0.00% | 2.12% | Bottom tier | |
Momentum | 8 | -26.7% | 2.9% | Bottom tier | |
Sentiment | 76 | 7 | 3 | Top tier |
Estimates — analyst targets and a simplified DCF, not investment advice.
Ten ratios that matter, each compared against its sector median and average — so you can see whether a number is rich or cheap relative to peers in the same sector.
The financial statements provided for QXO reflect a large revenue base, but the data do not break down revenue sources by business activity or segment, so the analysis focuses on the reported results without attributing Beacon's operations or products to QXO. In Q2 FY2026, QXO recorded revenue of $3.2 billion and gross profit of $803.0 million, equivalent to a calculated gross margin of approximately 25.1%.
QXO's net loss in Q2 FY2026 was approximately $55.0 million, or a loss of $0.14 per share. On a sequential basis compared with Q1 FY2026, revenue increased from $1.7 billion to $3.2 billion, gross profit rose from $409.3 million to $803.0 million, while the net loss narrowed from $227.1 million to $55.0 million and the gross margin improved from approximately 24.1% to approximately 25.1%.
On a trailing twelve-month basis for FY2026, revenue reached $9.9 billion and gross profit was $2.4 billion, but the net result remained a loss of $511.7 million and earnings per share were negative at approximately $0.67. These figures show that the expansion in revenue and the improvement in Q2 FY2026 results have not yet translated into sustainable net profitability.
The average analyst target is $27.33, compared with a target range of $18 to $32 and a consensus Buy rating; the average is only approximately 1% below the 52-week range high of $27.61, while the highest target exceeds that high by approximately 16%. A positive price-to-earnings ratio is unavailable because trailing twelve-month earnings per share for FY2026 are negative, so analyst targets should be weighed against a net loss of $511.7 million, the wide target range, and the 52-week range of $13.15–$27.61.
Figures in the text are as of 2026-08-29; the live price is shown at the top of the page.
No, QXO recorded a net loss of $55.0 million in Q2 FY2026, or a loss of $0.14 per share. However, the loss narrowed from $227.1 million and $0.35 per share in Q1 FY2026. The trailing twelve-month data for FY2026 remain weaker, showing a net loss of $511.7 million.
Revenue increased sequentially from $1.7 billion in Q1 FY2026 to $3.2 billion in Q2 FY2026. Gross profit rose from $409.3 million to $803.0 million, and the calculated gross margin improved from approximately 24.1% to approximately 25.1%. This coincided with an approximately 76% decline in the net loss, but the comparison is sequential, not year-over-year.
The stock carries a consensus Buy rating based on the data provided. The average price target is $27.33, with a high target of $32 and a low target of $18. The average is very close to the 52-week range high of $27.61, but the wide target range reflects meaningful disagreement over valuation.
Automated analysis for informational purposes only — not investment advice.
A positive price-to-earnings ratio is unavailable because reported earnings are negative. The loss per share was $0.14 in Q2 FY2026, and the loss per share in the trailing twelve-month data for FY2026 was approximately $0.67. Therefore, the traditional price-to-earnings ratio does not provide a useful basis for valuation before positive net profitability is achieved.
Beacon's February 27, 2025 call stated that QXO launched an unsolicited tender offer on January 27, 2025 at $124.25 for each Beacon share. Beacon's Board of Directors unanimously determined that the offer undervalued the company and recommended that shareholders not tender their shares. This information establishes only the existence of the initiative and its rejection as of that date; the data provided do not establish a subsequent outcome for the offer or the completion of a transaction.
