| Factor | Score | Distribution | Value | Avg | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Valuation | 100 | — | 17.2x | Top tier | |
Growth | 96 | 116.0% | 7.1% | Top tier | |
Quality | 2 | — | 4.5% | Bottom tier | |
Safety | 2 | — | 2.6x | Bottom tier | |
Capital Return | 0 | 0.00% | 0.19% | Bottom tier | |
Momentum | 17 | -100.0% | 0.5% | Bottom tier | |
Sentiment | 48 | — | 3 | Around median |
The available data does not disclose the nature of Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc.'s products, sectors, or revenue model, so the analysis is limited to its reported financial performance and does not attribute any undocumented activity to the company. For the trailing twelve-month period ended during fiscal year 2025, the company reported revenue of $3.2 million and gross profit of $26 thousand, compared with a net loss of $83.4 million and negative earnings per share of $12.04; this means gross profit amounted to only about 0.8% of revenue, while the net loss exceeded revenue by more than 26 times.
On a quarterly basis, revenue in Q3 of fiscal year 2025 was approximately $370 thousand, with gross profit of $58 thousand, a net loss of $7.5 million, and negative earnings per share of $2.70. This compares with revenue of $1.3 million, gross profit of $62 thousand, and a net loss of $4.6 million in Q2 of fiscal year 2025, and revenue of $171 thousand, a gross loss of $1 thousand, and a net loss of $6.0 million in Q1 of fiscal year 2025. Fiscal year 2024 recorded revenue of $1.4 million, a gross loss of $93 thousand, and a net loss of $65.4 million, highlighting an improvement in gross profit in fiscal year 2025 without the company coming close to net profitability.
Automated analysis for informational purposes only — not investment advice.
The price-to-earnings ratio is not a suitable basis for valuing Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. given its net loss of $83.4 million and negative earnings per share of $12.04 during the trailing twelve-month period ended in fiscal year 2025. The 52-week range extends from $0.0001 to $4.44, an extremely wide spread that reflects high repricing and volatility risks; therefore, any fundamental valuation depends on demonstrating sustainable revenue, improved gross profit, and reduced net losses.
Figures in the text are as of 2026-09-09; the live price is shown at the top of the page.
Revenue for the trailing twelve-month period ended during fiscal year 2025 was approximately $3.2 million, compared with $1.4 million in fiscal year 2024. The latest level is equivalent to about 2.3 times the previous fiscal year's revenue. However, the quarterly trajectory was not stable, as revenue declined from $1.3 million in Q2 of fiscal year 2025 to $370 thousand in Q3 of fiscal year 2025.
The company did not achieve net profitability in the available data. Its net loss was $83.4 million in the trailing twelve-month period ended during fiscal year 2025, with negative earnings per share of $12.04. Q3 of fiscal year 2025 also recorded a net loss of $7.5 million, compared with $4.6 million in Q2 and $6.0 million in Q1.
The company recorded a gross loss of $93 thousand in fiscal year 2024, then achieved gross profit of $26 thousand in the trailing twelve-month period ended during fiscal year 2025. On a quarterly basis, gross profit moved from negative $1 thousand in Q1 of fiscal year 2025 to positive $62 thousand in Q2 and then $58 thousand in Q3. The Q3 margin was about 15.7%, but it remained only about 0.8% on a trailing twelve-month basis.
The most significant risk is the mismatch between the scale of revenue and net losses. In the trailing twelve-month period ended during fiscal year 2025, the company generated only $3.2 million in revenue compared with a net loss of $83.4 million. The quarterly loss also widened to $7.5 million in Q3 of fiscal year 2025 after being $4.6 million in Q2.
The company's ability to recover the Q2 fiscal year 2025 revenue level of $1.3 million after it fell to $370 thousand in Q3 should be monitored. The sustainability of gross margin should also be tracked after it reached about 15.7% in Q3, compared with about 4.8% in Q2. Reducing the net loss from the $7.5 million level recorded in Q3 remains an important condition for demonstrating sustainable financial improvement.
