EL7.AI
Strategy BuilderCOT DataAdvanced NewsResearchNewEarnings CalendarEconomic Calendar
We use cookiesPrivacy Policy
EL7.AIEL7.AI

AI Financial Intelligence
Professional analysis of central bank decisions

© 2026 EL7.AI. All rights reserved.

Markets

  • News
  • Forex
  • Stocks
  • Crypto
  • Gold
  • Commodities
  • Indices
  • ETFs

Analysis

  • Fed
  • ECB
  • BLS
  • COT
  • Economic Calendar

Learn

  • Service Guide
  • Oil

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Data Methodology
  • AI Disclosure
  • Pricing
  • Enterprise
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Security
  • WhatsApp
Status data is currently unavailable

The information provided on EL7.AI is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

Home
Stocks
Aura Minerals
AUGO

AUGO Aura Minerals

Aura Minerals · NASDAQ
Market Closed
87.08
▲ ⁦+1.24%⁩ (+1.07)
Market Cap$7.2B
Beta0.29
52w Low52w High
27.77110.32
Last Week
⁦+2.93%⁩
Last Month
⁦+17.47%⁩
Last 3 Months
⁦+16.48%⁩
Last Year
⁦+216.77%⁩
EL7 Factor Analysis
How we score this
Overall38
Weak — below market medianSuper StockF 5/8Better than 38% of Market stocks, per EL7's model
FactorScoreDistributionValueAvgRank
▸
Valuation
62
23.6x▼17.8xAround median
▸
Growth
98
89.4%▲7.1%Top tier
▸
Quality
86
69.2%▲4.5%Top tier
▸
Safety
76
0.2x▲2.6xTop tier
▸
Capital Return
35
—2.12%Bottom tier
▸
Momentum
76
133.0%▲2.9%Top tier
▸
Sentiment
49
5▲3Around median
Fair Value
Current price$87
Analyst target · 7 analysts
$115
⁦+32%⁩
See it clearly undervalued
Range ⁦$115–$115⁩
vs
DCF (estimate)
$62
⁦-29%⁩
Sees it clearly overvalued
⁦7.9⁩% discount · ⁦12⁩% growth
Bottom lineThe two methods disagree — estimate range ⁦$62–$115⁩.

Estimates — analyst targets and a simplified DCF, not investment advice.

Compare in the screener
Premium content

Get Your Premium Account Now

  • Stock Deep Analysis
  • The Advanced News Platform
Recommended
Annual plan
$17/mo
Monthly plan
$29/mo

Analyst Consensus

This section combines price targets, revision history, analyst coverage changes, and an AI summary of what changed on the Street.

Price Target· 7 analysts setting price target
$114.70
⁦+31.7%⁩
Current Price $87.08·Median $114.70
Low
$114.70
High
$114.70
Street summary

A Jump in the Target Amid a Recent Rating Downgrade

The consensus price target rose from 52.8 to 114.7 over the last 30 days, an increase of 61.9 or 117.23%, while the number of analysts remained at 7. No changes were recorded over the last day or 7 days, and the high, low, and median are all 114.7, reflecting complete numerical consensus but not revealing any dispersion among individual estimates.\n\nThe estimates context points to improving revenue from 1.70 billion in 2026 to 2.56 billion in 2028, before declining to 2.39 billion in 2029. EPS declines slightly from 11.32 in 2026 to 11.192 in 2027, then rises to 15.8 in 2029. In contrast, Santander downgraded its rating on August 31 from Outperform to Neutral, so the picture appears more optimistic on the price-target front, but the latest rating signal shows increasing caution.

As of 2026-09-07
Revisions momentum · 30d
⁦+117.2%⁩
Average rating
★ 4.44
Buy
Analyst coverage
9
Buy conviction
100%
High
Rating activity · 30d
0↑ · 1↓
Target dispersion
0%
Analyst ratings over time9 analysts rating
4
5
Strong BuyBuyHoldSellStrong Sell
Rating trend — last 12 months4.30 → 4.44
Recent analyst moves
  • ⬇ Downgrade2026-08-31
    Santander
    OutperformNeutral
  • = Reiterate2025-12-03
    Goldman Sachs
    Buy· $52.80
  • = Reiterate2025-10-13
    Goldman Sachs
    Buy· $46.60
Premium content
Key Financials

Ten ratios that matter, each compared against its sector median and average — so you can see whether a number is rich or cheap relative to peers in the same sector.

StockSector medianSector averagetypical sector range
MetricValuePosition within sectorVerdict
  • P/E (TTM)
    23.60x
    4.94x39.51x
    Near median
  • Forward P/E
    7.75x
    3.70x29.59x
    Very cheap
  • EV / EBITDA
    8.94x
    2.62x20.92x
    Cheap
  • FCF Yield
    2.2%
    -21.3%8.9%
    Strong
  • Revenue Growth YoY
    89.4%
    -21.2%90.4%
    Strong
  • EPS Growth YoY
    550.0%
    -249.5%198.4%
    Exceptional
  • Gross Margin
    57.3%
    7.6%58.9%
    Strong
  • ROIC
    69.2%
    -52.6%20.2%
    Exceptional
  • Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.25x
    0.22x3.72x
    Low debt
  • Dividend Yield
    —
    —
  • Payout Ratio
    —
    —
  • Altman Z-Score
    —
    —
Financial Analysis
|

Stock Analysis

AI-generated
Based on 2026-08-06 data

Company Overview

Aura Minerals is a mining company that generates revenue from the production and sale of gold and metals from a portfolio of mines including MSG, Borborema, Almas, Minosa, Apoena, and Aranzazu, while simultaneously developing Era Dorada and evaluating Matupa. Its growth plan relies on expanding capacity at existing mines, improving underground development at MSG, executing new projects, and pursuing acquisitions in gold and copper across the Americas. In the first half of fiscal year 2026, production reached 158 thousand ounces, while management targeted production of 182 thousand to 232 thousand ounces in the second half and a full-year range of 340 thousand to 390 thousand ounces.

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, Aura Minerals recorded revenue of $336.0 million, compared with $382.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026, due to lower production and a lower average gold price compared with the previous quarter. Gross profit was $191.5 million, representing a gross margin of approximately 57.0%, and adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization were $197 million. The company reported net income of $217.7 million and earnings per share of $2.60, but net income benefited from $126 million in non-cash gains related to the revaluation of gold derivatives, while adjusted net income was $97 million.

On a trailing-twelve-month basis through 2026, revenue reached approximately $1.3 billion, gross profit reached $737.5 million, and net income reached $298.6 million. Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization also exceeded $800 million, with production of 313 thousand ounces. Operationally, four units generated adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization of between $43 million and $56 million, while Apoena and MSG were the weakest in the second quarter of fiscal year 2026. The company ended the quarter with approximately $250 million in cash, net debt of $168 million, and a net-debt-to-adjusted-earnings-before-interest-taxes-depreciation-and-amortization ratio of 0.2 times.

What's Driving the Stock

Earnings callEDGAR filings30-day newsInsider activity

Automated analysis for informational purposes only — not investment advice.

The most important operational driver is the increase management is targeting in the second half of fiscal year 2026: production of between 182 thousand and 232 thousand ounces after 158 thousand ounces in the first half, supporting the maintenance of full-year guidance of between 340 thousand and 390 thousand ounces.
  • Management expects a gradual improvement at MSG during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2026, with second-half productivity increasing by approximately 50% to 60% and average grades rising by approximately 25% to 35% compared with the first half. Proven and probable reserves at MSG also increased from 370 thousand to 753 thousand ounces within six months, while measured and indicated resources increased from 1 million to 1.8 million ounces.
  • Aura Minerals is expanding its existing mines: Almas is targeting an annual processing capacity of approximately 3 million tonnes by the end of fiscal year 2026, after the mine was designed for 1.3 million tonnes, while the installation of new filters at Borborema during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2026 is expected to remove a plant bottleneck and increase production alongside improving grades.
  • Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization were $197 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2026 and exceeded $800 million over the trailing twelve months, marking the twelfth consecutive quarter of growth on a trailing-twelve-month basis. Management believes that the expected increase in production during the second half could raise this level, provided gold prices remain stable or increase.
  • The company announced distributions of $60 million, equivalent to $0.72 per share and payable during the third quarter of fiscal year 2026, alongside a share repurchase program of up to $200 million. Management explained that future shareholder returns will be divided between cash dividends and repurchases, rather than assuming that cash distributions alone will continue at previous levels.
  • Buying & Selling Case

    ▲ Buying Case4 pts

    • +Aura Minerals combines production growth with a low-leverage balance sheet; its net-debt-to-adjusted-earnings-before-interest-taxes-depreciation-and-amortization ratio was 0.2 times at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, despite spending $58 million on growth and returning $68 million to shareholders during the quarter.
    • +The expansions at MSG, Borborema, and Almas provide a defined path for increasing scale: MSG is targeting production of approximately 80 thousand ounces annually, Almas is progressing toward annual capacity of 3 million tonnes, while Borborema's stated mine life increased from 11 years to 35 years following reserve growth and development.
    • +Financial performance improved markedly compared with fiscal year 2025; the company moved from a net loss of $79.3 million in fiscal year 2025 to net income of $298.6 million over the trailing-twelve-month period through 2026, with revenue of approximately $1.3 billion and earnings per share of $3.69.
    • +Operating cash flows fund a substantial portion of growth and capital returns; recurring cash flow was $80 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2026 and would have been approximately $120 million before gold-hedging losses, compared with $54 million in expansionary capital expenditures and $68 million in distributions and share repurchases.

    ▼ Selling Case6 pts

    • −Fiscal year 2026 guidance depends on a significant acceleration in the second half, as production must rise from 158 thousand ounces in the first half to between 182 thousand and 232 thousand ounces in the second half. MSG productivity in the first and second quarters was below management's expectations, and the company acknowledged the possibility of ending the year at the low end of MSG guidance, making execution in the third and fourth quarters critical.
    • −All-in sustaining cost was approximately $2,000 per ounce in the second quarter of fiscal year 2026 and would have been approximately $1,500 to $1,600 excluding the impact of the MSG transformation. Achieving cost guidance faces pressure from higher oil and chemical prices, in addition to the Brazilian real moving from approximately 5.50 to nearly 5.00 per dollar compared with the assumption used when guidance was issued.
    • −Revenue in the second quarter of fiscal year 2026 declined to $336.0 million from $382.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026 due to lower production and a lower average gold price. Gross profit also declined to $191.5 million from $193.5 million, illustrating the sensitivity of quarterly results to mining sequences, grades, and metal prices.
    • −The quality of reported net income in the second quarter of fiscal year 2026 warrants caution; of the $217.7 million total, $126 million came from non-cash gains on gold derivatives, while adjusted net income was $97 million. At the same time, the company paid $37 million to settle realized gold-hedging losses during the quarter, and management said hedging losses would continue during fiscal year 2026 and fiscal year 2027.
    • −Some assets face execution and operating-environment risks; management indicated that negative developments could emerge during the construction of Era Dorada and that permitting Tolda Fria in Colombia would remain difficult until the impact of the change in government becomes clear. Excess El Nino rainfall could also affect Minosa production in Honduras during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2026, although management does not expect a significant impact on Aura Minerals as a whole.

    Valuation

    The analyst consensus is Buy, with an average price target of $52.8, but the highest and lowest targets are identical at $52.8, meaning the range of estimates offers no diversity of views. This target is below the midpoint of the 52-week range of $29.11 to $110.321 and significantly below its high, consistent with a revaluation reflecting gold-price volatility and the execution risks associated with increasing production at MSG and the other mines. No published price-to-earnings ratio is available, so the valuation assessment rests on the narrow analyst target, the 52-week range, and earnings quality after excluding non-cash gains from gold derivatives.

    BuyAnalyst target: $52.8(-39.4%)

    Figures in the text are as of 2026-08-30; the live price is shown at the top of the page.

    FAQ

    What drove Aura Minerals' results in the second quarter of fiscal year 2026?

    Revenue was $336.0 million and gross profit was $191.5 million, representing a gross margin of approximately 57.0%. The company recorded adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization of $197 million, despite lower production and a lower average gold price compared with the first quarter of fiscal year 2026. Reported net income reached $217.7 million, but $126 million of it was related to non-cash gains from the revaluation of gold derivatives, while adjusted net income was $97 million.

    Can Aura Minerals achieve its fiscal year 2026 production guidance?

    The company produced 158 thousand ounces in the first half of fiscal year 2026 and is targeting between 182 thousand and 232 thousand ounces in the second half. Management maintained the full-year production range of between 340 thousand and 390 thousand ounces, supported by improvements at MSG and higher grades at Borborema, Apoena, and Aranzazu. However, MSG was weaker than expected in the first half, and management acknowledged that it could finish near the low end of its guidance, so achieving the range depends on actual execution during the third and fourth quarters.

    How important is the MSG transformation plan to Aura Minerals' growth?

    Aura Minerals increased MSG's proven and probable reserves from 370 thousand to 753 thousand ounces within six months and increased measured and indicated resources from 1 million to 1.8 million ounces. Management expects production in the second half of fiscal year 2026 to increase by approximately 50% to 60% and grades to rise by approximately 25% to 35% compared with the first half. The subsequent operating target is production of approximately 80 thousand ounces annually and a reduction in all-in sustaining cost to approximately $2,000–$2,200 per ounce after completing infrastructure and underground mine development.

    How does Aura Minerals return capital to shareholders?

    The company announced distributions of $60 million, equivalent to $0.72 per share, related to the results of the second quarter of fiscal year 2026 and scheduled for payment during the third quarter. It also approved a share repurchase program of up to $200 million after spending $68 million on distributions and repurchases during the second quarter. Management explained that cash dividends and repurchases will share the total capital return in the future, so repurchases should not be assumed to come on top of the same previous level of distributions.

    What are Aura Minerals' main cost and cash-flow risks?

    All-in sustaining cost was approximately $2,000 per ounce in the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, affected by the MSG transformation phase, and would have declined to approximately $1,500–$1,600 excluding it. Oil and chemical prices and stronger local currencies in Brazil and Mexico are pressuring costs, while the company is relying on higher grades and production and its strategic procurement program to offset this. Recurring cash flow was $80 million, compared with approximately $120 million before gold-hedging losses, with $37 million paid to settle those hedges during the quarter.

    How should the analyst target for AUGO shares be interpreted?

    The stock has a Buy consensus and an average target of $52.8, but the highest and lowest targets are identical at the same figure, so there is no broad range reflecting differences among analyst estimates. The target is below the midpoint of the 52-week range of $29.11 to $110.321 and far from its high, reflecting a significant revaluation relative to the range's highest levels. No published price-to-earnings ratio is available, so the analyst target should be weighed against the guidance's dependence on accelerating second-half production and the fact that $126 million of net income in the second quarter of fiscal year 2026 consisted of non-cash derivative gains.

  • −Market valuation and share-price volatility represent additional risks; the consensus analyst target of $52.8 is more than half below the 52-week range high of $110.321, and no published price-to-earnings ratio is available for comparison. The insider signal was also strong_sell, with net sales of $115.8 million over three months and 35 sales versus 5 purchases through August 27, 2026, with the caveat that these sales may have been prearranged unless the data proves otherwise.