StocksMediumUpdatedOriginally published 23 September 2026Updated 23 September 2026
6 min read

Cracker Barrel Adjusted EPS Reaches $0.99 as Q4 Revenue Falls 2.2%

Key Facts

1Adjusted EPS was $0.99 versus a $0.17 consensus, a $0.82 beat.
2Revenue was $849.3 million, down 2.2% from the year-earlier quarter.
3Comparable restaurant sales fell 2.1%, while comparable retail sales rose 0.7%.
4For fiscal 2027, the company expects revenue between $3.325 billion and $3.4 billion and adjusted EBITDA between $180 million and $200 million.

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store reported fiscal 2026 fourth-quarter results on September 23 for the period ended July 31, combining a positive earnings surprise with continued year-over-year sales weakness. The company posted adjusted earnings of $0.99 a share and GAAP diluted EPS of $0.54, making it important to distinguish between the two measures when assessing performance. Adjusted EPS exceeded a $0.17 consensus by $0.82, making the earnings surprise the clearest supportive element in the report. Revenue was $849.3 million, about $4.31 million above a $844.99 million estimate when calculated from the rounded revenue figure disclosed by the company. Revenue nevertheless declined 2.2% from $868.0 million a year earlier, showing that the expectations beat did not represent a comprehensive demand recovery. CBRL had closed at $45.48 on September 22, while the September 23 close had not occurred when the story was prepared, so describing available price data as missing was incorrect.

GAAP net income rose to $12.2 million from $6.8 million a year earlier despite the revenue contraction, making the composition of the profit increase central to the analysis. GAAP diluted EPS increased to $0.54 from $0.30, confirming that the improvement was not confined to the adjusted measure. On an adjusted basis, net income rose to $22.4 million from $16.7 million, an improvement larger than the sales movement alone would suggest. Adjusted EPS also increased to $0.99 from $0.74, partly explaining the wide margin over analyst expectations. Adjusted EBITDA reached $62.1 million compared with $55.7 million in the year-earlier period, indicating improved profit before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The company said, however, that the measure included an approximately $9.1 million benefit from tariff refunds net of related investments, so the entire increase cannot be treated as recurring.

Restaurants generated 82.2% of quarterly revenue, compared with 17.8% from retail, leaving restaurant economics as the largest determinant of company profitability. Cost of goods sold declined to 28.8% of revenue from 30.5% a year earlier, an improvement that helped offset the effect of weaker sales. In the opposite direction, labor and related expenses increased to 37.5% from 36.5%, keeping wage pressure visible within the cost structure. Other store operating expenses declined to 23.7% from 24.9%, providing additional margin support alongside the lower cost of goods. These movements explain how adjusted EBITDA reached $62.1 million despite a 2.2% revenue decline, as savings in some categories offset weaker sales volume. Even so, the $9.1 million tariff benefit should be separated from the underlying operating improvement because investors are assessing the durability of margins, not merely one quarter's result.

Comparable restaurant sales declined 2.1% from a year earlier, while comparable retail sales increased 0.7%, revealing a clear divergence between the two sides of the store. Revenue from Cracker Barrel stores alone was approximately $837.0 million, compared with $849.7 million a year earlier, confirming that the central pressure remained in existing operations. Within that total, restaurant revenue fell to $686.2 million from $700.0 million, a decline larger than the increase delivered by retail. Retail revenue rose to $150.8 million from $149.7 million, but the smaller scale of that business prevented it from offsetting restaurant weakness. Consolidated results included Maple Street Biscuit Company through its July 20 divestiture, a factor that must be considered when comparing revenue across periods. The comparison therefore does not reflect a perfectly constant business portfolio, leaving comparable-sales trends more useful than the aggregate change alone for assessing underlying demand.

The fourth quarter looked stronger than fiscal 2026 as a whole, as annual revenue declined to $3.3187 billion from $3.4837 billion, a decrease of approximately 5%. Full-year adjusted EPS fell to $0.80 from $3.16, showing that the quarterly improvement did not offset the damage accumulated during the rest of the year. Full-year adjusted EBITDA also dropped to $147.7 million from $224.3 million, providing a more conservative baseline for comparing the following year's guidance. In the economic backdrop, official data released September 16 showed U.S. retail and food-services sales rising 1.2% month over month and 6.0% year over year in August. That broad nominal aggregate provides spending context but does not by itself demonstrate improved demand among Cracker Barrel customers or in its restaurants. The Federal Reserve raised rates by 25 basis points to a range between 3.75% and 4%, providing context for capital costs and discretionary spending rather than evidence of a direct stock driver.

Total debt declined to $337.2 million from $484.6 million at the end of the previous fiscal year, giving the balance sheet a tangible improvement alongside the earnings result. During the quarter, the company repaid $150 million of maturing short-term notes, reducing its near-term refinancing requirement. It also sold and leased back 26 stores for approximately $77 million of net proceeds, using the funds to reduce debt rather than recording them as operating profit. Consolidated total leverage was 1.7 times and senior leverage was 0.0 times, with approximately $541.3 million of available credit-facility capacity. Lower debt reduces financing risk, but the sale-leaseback exchanges property ownership for future lease commitments, so its full effect requires monitoring in subsequent quarters. The company also declared a quarterly dividend of $0.25 a share for shareholders of record on October 16, payable November 12.

Management expects fiscal 2027 revenue between $3.325 billion and $3.4 billion, compared with the $3.3187 billion recorded in fiscal 2026. The range assumes comparable restaurant-sales growth between 3% and 5% with no new store openings, making improved performance at existing locations the foundation of the plan. The company also targets adjusted EBITDA between $180 million and $200 million, compared with $147.7 million in the year just ended, an increase requiring more than revenue stability. The plan assumes approximately 3.0% commodity inflation and hourly wage inflation between 2.5% and 3.0%, placing an additional burden on cost savings. Management set capital spending between $110 million and $125 million, a cash use that must be balanced against debt reduction and dividends. Achieving the targets together requires the company to convert comparable-sales growth into recurring operating profit without relying on a similar exceptional benefit.

The first test of guidance will be comparable-sales growth between 3% and 5%, alongside progress in adjusted EBITDA toward a range between $180 million and $200 million. Profit composition will matter as much as its level because the current quarter received a $9.1 million tariff-refund benefit that is not necessarily a permanent source. Investors should compare adjusted EPS of $0.99 with GAAP EPS of $0.54 to understand the exclusions rather than treating the figures as one measure. On capital allocation, the reduction in debt to $337.2 million offers more protection, although lease commitments created by property sales warrant attention in future disclosures. The next fixed shareholder dates are October 16 for dividend eligibility and November 12 for payment, known cash catalysts that do not substitute for operating improvement. The recovery case would strengthen if revenue moves within a range between $3.325 billion and $3.4 billion alongside sustained restaurant growth and less reliance on nonrecurring items; continued demand weakness would undermine it.